Re: plan for xwt.standard
David Crawshaw <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.xwt.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, at 10:24 PM, Adam Megacz wrote: > Hrm, really? If xwt.widget.foo applies xwt.theme.foo, why would the > theme need to overlay on top of xwt.widget.foo? I was taking the perspective that really simple things which don't have a need for being split could be stored solely in the root namespace. Like scrollpane. It would not have theme.scrollpane. However, if you're actually looking at splitting the roots apart, then I'm up for having everything in theme, and preapply it across to widget. In fact, I like it quite a lot. d _______________________________________________ http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/dev