Re: plan for xwt.standard
Andrew Kohlsmith <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.xwt.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Benshaw Canada |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I was taking the perspective that really simple things which don't have > a need for being split could be stored solely in the root namespace. > Like scrollpane. It would not have theme.scrollpane. Right now the only code in xwt.standard is vbox -- I am very much for the idea that xwt.standard (changing to xwt.widget, but I prefer widgets... widget seems odd to be but I'll get used to it I'm sure) contain ONLY stubs/documentation and no code. xwt.theme removes whatever's in xwt.standard and I think that is most excellent. > However, if you're actually looking at splitting the roots apart, then > I'm up for having everything in theme, and preapply it across to > widget. In fact, I like it quite a lot. exactly. :-) Regards, Andrew _______________________________________________ http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/dev