Re: widgets plan proposal
David Crawshaw <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.xwt.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday, April 2, 2003, at 01:06 AM, Charles Goodwin wrote: > IMHO the xwt.theme, xwt.lib, xwt.widgets layout does not address the > priorities but rather gives the novice more to swallow when they are > looking > for somewhere to start. I honestly don't see this. There are a few packages, yes. A beginner is going to want to know what package to start in. The docs tell them to go to xwt.widget. xwt.widget will have everything they need for a long time, in a clean directory. It's no more confusing than if a beginner stumbles into xwt.widget.theme. I just don't see it as an argument against the toplevel namespaces. The toplevel does have another advantage in making sure our themes are well separated. It's going to require some initial thought to make sure we have all the functionality where we can override it (xwt.theme), but it can be done. d _______________________________________________ http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/dev