Re: widgets plan proposal
Adam Megacz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.xwt.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | XWT |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Andrew Kohlsmith <[email protected]> writes: > > > it's the bare minimum to achieve the desired behaviours that 99% > > > of the themes will use anyway. > > That sounds like almost exactly what I'm calling for. Excellent. > Well that is a problem if it's supposed to _work_ without an xwt.theme() Oh, I'm sorry; I interpreted this to mean that > Do you have a HEAD where you don't know if it'll work or not (but if > you want it to work you use a branch tag for the latest stable), or > do you have a HEAD where you have a pretty good guess that it will > work, and if you want it to work for sure, you use the stable tag... Try for the latter, but the former will happen now and then. > > > I'll take a look at it. What software are you using to generate thse > > > reports? > > Custom perl scripts. > Hmm... Anything top secret? Can I get a copy? http://cvs.xwt.org/CVSROOT/log?rev=1.71&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup http://cvs.xwt.org/CVSROOT/commit?rev=1.87&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup - a _______________________________________________ http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/dev