RE: Organising the xwt namespace
Charles Goodwin <[email protected]> Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:40:25 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.xwt.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <308906BE5D07D5119285009027D61C5722F690@NTFPS1> |
Yes, but... org.xwt.themes.monopoly.button preapply xwt.widgets.button which preapplies xwt.theme.button which preapplies xwt.lib.button (altho xwt.lib.button probably won't exist), and that's where this falls apart. -----Original Message----- From: David Crawshaw [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 02 April 2003 15:26 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [xwt-dev] Organising the xwt namespace On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 12:25 AM, Charles Goodwin wrote: > Now with this being in xwt.theme, if you want to differ from this, > either > xwt.theme either has to allow the removal of the above boxen to make > way for > a new box structure, or... ? Force this structure on everybody else? But your overlaying something new on top of it. theme()/overlay() doesn't apply templates on top of each other, it chooses the first template it finds in the overlay stack. xwt.theme('xwt.theme', 'org.xwt.theme.monopoly') Now when someone requests xwt.theme.button, they get org.xwt.theme.monopoly.button instead. It doesn't matter what weird box structure goes into xwt.theme.button. d _______________________________________________ http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/dev _______________________________________________ http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/dev