Re: Clarification of layout proposal
David Crawshaw <[email protected]> Thu, 3 Apr 2003 19:22:09 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.xwt.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 07:23 PM, Charles Goodwin wrote: >> xwt.widget - preapplies - xwt.theme >> xwt.standard - overlays - xwt.theme >> xwt.standard - preapplies - xwt.lib >> >> What advantage is there in killing the value of xwt.theme? > > Ok. You seem to be forgetting that for many of the widgets, there are > two > versions. 1) the lib and 2) the themable. I can't understand the reasoning for this. Are you saying that 1) is theme independent code, then 2) is more theme independent code that needs to be preapplied to 3) that's theme dependent code? What's the point? Why can't you just have all your theme independent code in xwt.lib, and then your theme implementation in org.xwt.theme.<whatever>, and then this behavior separation tier I'm talking about in xwt.widget? With xwt.theme being a definition file for org.xwt.theme.<whatever>. Why do you have to split it up twice before getting to the theme code? It's no use to a power developer, and it's no use to theme development. d _______________________________________________ http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/dev