Re: One Last Description
Andrew Kohlsmith <[email protected]> Thu, 3 Apr 2003 22:18:05 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.xwt.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Benshaw Canada |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> An app developer would use two interfaces for widgets: xwt.widget and > xwt.theme. An app developer would never use xwt.standard (assuming it's > a theme), just as they would never use org.xwt.theme.monopoly. These > are overlayed on top of xwt.theme. Ok. > The only thing I meant when talking about overlay() is it would be nice > if it worked without it. But that would require a theme in xwt.theme. > For the sake of compromise, Adam just suggested we defer that decision. Ok. As I'd said in the FINAL CALL thread, I'm trying to avoid code duplication and copy'n'paste programming. I'll leave this alone here so the discussion occurs there. > xwt.widget - preapplies - xwt.theme > xwt.theme - is just a stub > org.xwt.theme.simple - preapplies - xwt.lib > org.xwt.theme.simple - overlays - xwt.theme xwt.theme being just a stub is what I am in favor of -- no code there since if you theme that code disappears. Regards, Andrew _______________________________________________ http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/dev