Re: FINAL CALL
David Crawshaw <[email protected]> Fri, 4 Apr 2003 19:16:11 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.xwt.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Friday, April 4, 2003, at 07:22 PM, Charles Goodwin wrote: > However, > it's... perverse to have xwt.lib.layout.widget preapply xwt.lib, isn't > it? Just to chuck in 2 cents, it wouldn't preapply. Just have your theme apply both xwt.lib.widget and xwt.lib.layout.widget. I agree that preapplies within xwt.lib would be messy, and we should avoid it. > xwt.theme -> I understand this one a little better now, you want > people to > import xwt.widget, right, then xwt.widget preapplies xwt.theme which is > overlayed by overlay() to some.theme.dir and some.theme.dir preapplies > stuff > from xwt.lib - right? Which I see works fine. Yep. :) > However, does this mean xwt.overlay() is just going to be xwt.theme() > renamed? It's doing exactly the same job. All you are doing is > moving what > is being themed, around. Yep. It's just a name change to better describe its function with the proposed resource model. We don't need any technology we don't have to make this work. d _______________________________________________ http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/dev