Re: typeof
David Crawshaw <[email protected]> Thu, 10 Apr 2003 19:10:48 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.xwt.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday, April 10, 2003, at 07:05 PM, Adam Megacz wrote: > Then IMHO all templates which preapply selection_mux should also > declare a trap __selection_mux_kind that returns their selection mux > "class". Are you ok with selection_mux becoming selectable? Something Charlie and I came up with last night when starting the widget transition. This sounds like a call for the 'type' attribute for classing Charlie was suggesting. It's just a matter of: should we apply it generally to all widgets (and have types like button), or just to selectables? > Actually, this is a great example of why instanceof is a bad > thing... if you created a new kind of radiobutton that should be > "grouped" with other radio buttons, but doesn't use the same template, > there would be no way to "fake it out" if XWT gave you an instanceof > primitive. Yep, good argument. d _______________________________________________ http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/dev