Re: [xwt-users] Versioning Systems
Eric Merritt <cyberlync-/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.xwt.users |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- Andrew Kohlsmith <[email protected]> wrote: > > Anyway, here's an overview of most of the free > available options: > > > http://www.thefreecountry.com/programming/versioncontrol.shtml > > This is all fine and good, but for what we're doing > with XWT (java source > and widgets), what are these systems doing that is > _significantly_ better > than CVS? I wasn't aware of any issues with CVS > that would warrant tearing > it out for something less popular and universal and > more complex. > > Regards, > Andrew > CVS is probably the worst widly available SCM out there right now. It is however free and fairly easy to install so people use it. CVS has the following flaws. - it's slow - no support for versioned renaming files and creating/deleting dictionaries - no support for atomic commits over multiple files - weak tagging and branching support - no support for distributed repositories - CVS only tracks the history of individual files Thats a list of the most obvious flaws, there is a host of others. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com