Re: [xwt-users] Now c 239923

Eric Merritt <cyberlync-/[email protected]> writes:
> on the list. The bayasians (horribly misspelled ;)
> type filters are excellent.

I personally don't like them because a false positive, however rare,
is absolutely unacceptable for me.  If even a single non-spam gets
deleted, that's worse (for me) than no spam protection at all.

If people want to run their own bayesian filters, though, there's
nothing stopping them from doing that.

Right now I use DCC; it's like Vipul's Razor but WAY better.  I'm
going to combine it with a whitelist/blacklist pretty soon, too.

  - a

-- 
"Education is not filling a bucket but lighting a fire." -- WB Yeats