Re: Renaming onedimensional

orientable?

  - a


"Charles Goodwin" <[email protected]> writes:
> > Well I'd prefer to break the english language than break the -able
> > endings. It's not like we've never done it before:
> >
> > focusable - not a word
> > themeable - not a word (coming soon)
> > draggable - not a word
> > popupable - not a word
> > redirectable - not a word
> >
> > In fact, the only ones that are real are clickable and selectable. :)
> >
> > So... maybe linerable?
> >
> > It's nice to be able to ls *able.xwt. It's also nice to say to new
> > users that there's  a definitive naming scheme for different parts.
> >
> > d
> 
> Ok, convincing argument, I'm happy with that.  Although I'd probably go
> with linearable over linerable.
> 
> Also, perhaps autocomplete should become autocompleteable or completeable.
> 
> - Charlie
> 
> The future of webapps - www.xwt.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> widgets mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/widgets
> 

--