Re: borderable or boder?

On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 05:10:15PM +0100, Charles Goodwin wrote:

> I'm going to use 'border.xwt' for having borders based on the premise 
> that if we were to have borderable, then we should really rename bevel 
> to bevelable and that's something I'm reluctant to do.
> 
> A border is a border, not an 'ability' which is what I would consider 
> all the -ables to be.

Agreed. Given the way XWT boxes work, anything is borderable or
bevelable anyhow since it's simple to put a border/bevel around any
'control' (a.k.a. hierarchy of boxen).

> After that, I'll be adjusting the 0.5pre3 widgets to work with Nitrogen. 
>  Once text is working in Nitrogen, we (I?) should be able to get the 
> widgets up and running pretty quickly and then I'll improve tabpane and 
> tree, and add table.

Things seem to be shaping up nicely. Looks like the timeframe is going
to match nicely with my backend stuff being done.

-- 
Emiliano