Re: rfc: selectable to be radiable

Yeah, I suggest that selectable means "can be selected" and
muxselectable (which preapplies selectable) be a selectable that
unselects its peers.

The old widget set had a neat way of telling widgets which other boxen
were their peers.

  - a

Charles Goodwin <[email protected]> writes:
> Adam Megacz wrote:
> >>For instance, a <check/> is selectable as in you say 'selected=true', 
> >>but it doesn't apply selectable.
> > 
> > Why doesn't it?  Perhaps it should.
> 
> It doesn't because selectable is the 'mutually exclusive selection' 
> behaviour currently.  That's what the point was; semantically it should 
> which means that 'selectable' is misleading and hence needs renaming.
> 
> - Charlie
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> widgets mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/widgets
> 

-- 
"Education is not filling a bucket but lighting a fire." -- WB Yeats