Re: Vote on new 'exlusive selectable' name

electable is my vote given it is to describe a reusable nature of 
choosing N.

Charles: what about a min votes and max votes property vs just a single 
limit?
A select only one would be min=max=1
An election for choose up to 5 candidates would then be min=1; max=5
    (presented 10 choices but say I only like/agree to 3)

-Jeff

Charles Goodwin wrote:

> Charles Goodwin wrote:
>
>> .-------------------.-------------------.
>> |     electable     |   muxselectable   |
>> |___________________|___________________|
>
>
> This could be made irrelevant anyway.
>
> Rod and I were discussing multiple-selection widgets like lists. 
> Essentially, they share the vast majority of features with 
> exclusive-selection widgets.
>
> What we're thinking is that the multiple-selection widget will offer a 
> multiple-selection with a maximum of N.  Exclusive selection will be 
> simply N=1.
>
> This will be useful with things like lists where you would want to be 
> able to select more than one list item.
>
> - Charlie
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> widgets mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/widgets
>