Re: RFC: drop bevel

Charlie,

I agree with Rod. There isn't a need for a 1 in the name unless there 
are different actual images depending on the width (which I don't there 
are now). As for the '_'; if you don't firstSecond, then first_second is 
the 2nd choice (unless it is a single word).

-Jeff

Rod Martin wrote:

>Since we have the thickness property, is it really necessary to include the 
>'1' in 'bevel1up'?
>
>Rod
>
>On Tuesday 28 October 2003 12:10 pm, Charles Goodwin wrote:
>  
>
>>Since we are redoing border anyway, bevel (which is just a form of
>>border) seems somewhat redundant.
>>
>>The properties form and thickness can be easily incorporated in a name
>>which can be grafted to the desired root directory where a borders (now
>>broken-up) images can be found.
>>
>><border name="bevel_1_up" />
>>
>>Any objections?
>>
>>On a related note: bevel_1_up or bevel1up?
>>
>>- Charlie
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>widgets mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/widgets
>>    
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>widgets mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/widgets
>
>  
>