Re: [kde-artists] please turn off label animations...
Hugo Pereira Da Costa <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.artists |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On January 5, 2010, you wrote: > >> So are you suggesting that we disable it permanently ? >> > not permanently; just for 4.4.0. i think we should keep the actual code there > and work on making this really good for a future release. there must be > solutions for the remaining corner cases, we just need to look hard enough :) > > >> konqueror), though I agree there is room for improvement. Can't this >> wait for kde4.5 ? Or for a backported bug-fix when someone files a bug ? >> > my concern is that the negative results are noticeable in enough easy-to- > trigger situations that people will dismiss this feature and view the rest of > oxygen's progress in 4.4 in a negative light due to it. that would be > unfortunate at this point as the other animations are all rather great (imho, > anyways :) and the style and window deco are looking terrific these days. > > we didn't have these label transitions before, so it's not a regression to > ship without them now. nothing is fundamentally broken by not having the label > animations, either. > > so it's not a step backwards (relative to past 4.x releases) to skip the label > transition in 4.4.x. including this particular animation in its current state > would, i feel, pose a risk to the acceptance of all the animations. those > animation will, unfortunately, not be accepted with open arms by some people > who are anti-animation or even just anti-whatever-cool-that-KDE-does for no > particularly good reason; let's not give them ammunition ;) > > there are a number of other really nice anims in oxygen for 4.4 that i think > everyone will love so it's not like removing the label animation will ruin all > of your fine efforts, and when the label animation is in good working order we > can either backport the fixes as a 4.4.x update or include it in 4.5.0 and it > will be perceived as an upgrade to the user. > > i'm just trying to help minimize the risk to oxygen's continued acceptance and > maximize the user's experience. we're releasing 4.4, not 4.0, so we need to be > a bit more conservative i think in what we unleash here, and the style/window > deco influence the usability of every single app. > > just my 0.02 > > As a matter of fact, I do find annoying (with or without animation) that kmail (and thunderbird) updates the new mail window title for every single character I type. In my opinion, it should be buffered, and updated if I don't type a new character in say 1/2 second (or even 1 second). If it were so, the current animation would work just right. But hell. Just my opinion. ______________________________________________________________________________ [email protected] | https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-artists