Re: [kde-artists] Doubts on Dual Licensing

Hi,

I've tried to get in touch with Jonathan Riddle who commited the license
change 5 years ago
(http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/kdesupport/oxygen-icons/COPYING?r1=699615&r2=760422)
but didn't yet get a response yet.

I guess without any further information on why things have been changed
I'll have to go with the 5 year old revision of the icons. Not what I
hoped to get but as it looks like the onyl possibility.

Tom

Am 06.02.13 21:43, schrieb Tom Schindl:
> Hi,
> 
> the oxygene site http://www.oxygen-icons.org/ states on
> http://www.oxygen-icons.org/?page_id=4 that the icons are dual licensed
> under Creative Common Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Library
> General Public License but when I browse your code repository
> (http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/kdesupport/oxygen-icons/) only LGPL is
> mentionned there inside COPYING.
> 
> My question now is the statement on the oxygene site still true or are
> you *not* supporting Creative Common Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 anymore?
> 
> My problem is that I'm not allowed to use LGPL and would be in need for
> the Creative Commons option. I'd like to use your icons in an
> Eclipse.org project and there LGPL is unfortunately not allowed but
> Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 would work.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Tom
> 


-- 
B e s t S o l u t i o n . a t                        EDV Systemhaus GmbH
------------------------------------------------------------------------
tom schindl                 geschäftsführer/CEO
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eduard-bodem-gasse 5-7/1   A-6020 innsbruck     fax      ++43 512 935833
http://www.BestSolution.at                      phone    ++43 512 935834
______________________________________________________________________________
[email protected] |  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-artists