Re: [kde-artists] We need a Vision!
Björn Balazs <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:40:26 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.artists,gmane.comp.kde.promotion |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2639135.Q5nrSs0bVf@rechenknecht> |
Am Donnerstag, 13. März 2014, 11:42:20 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo: > On Thursday, March 13, 2014 10:55:09 Björn Balazs wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 11. März 2014, 23:57:57 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo: > > > On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 14:55:13 Björn Balazs wrote: > > impossible to reach them. We do have contact to all users - because we are > > delivering software to them. > > Not really; we write software, but we rarely do the actual delivery. > > Others take that software, package it and deliver it to their end users with > no interface to us. When I was traveling between events around the world > promoting KDE (at one point, twice a month on average) I routinely ran into > groups doing exactly this whom we had (and in many cases, continue to have) > little to no contact with. > > So people are using things we make, but there are middlemen between the end > users and us with a disconnect between us and those middlemen. These same > middlemen often change how the software is presented to suit their own ideas > and the needs of their audience. > > Is it possible to build a communication channel between our global user base > and KDE? Perhaps, though I am skeptical given the nature of how software > KDE writes gets into the hands of people. Assuming it is possible, it will > take years to accomplish as it would mean working both with the various > middlemen involved and likely putting new features into our software that > will take years to reach our full audience. (Not everyone upgrades every > release, or even annually ..) > > Assuming we want a vision statement this year, I think one needs to be > realistic about that. Agreed. This obviously is a rather long term goal - but worth working on it - even though this should be done in a different discussion. We have to work with what we have at the moment - always beeing aware of the limitations. > > experiences. So we could e.g. ask what they associate with KDE or how KDE > > needs to turn in order to have their mother / girlfirend / ... use it. > > Then > > The former question is valid, the latter question will get you noise. When > asked a question, people will give an answer, regardless of whether they are > in a position to do so with any factual basis or useful insight. This is > the nature of surveying people (my wife does it for a living, as do many of > our mutual friends .. it's an interesting, and difficult, thing to get > useful information out of people by asking questions.) > > What we could do is learn about the people who do use KDE and about those > who we would like to use KDE. We'd still need to formulate a "how to get X > to use KDE software.." based on that, however. > > The surveying alone is a task that is likely to take the better part of a > year to get useful results. Again agreed. The questions were rather quick examples than actual candidates for the survey. And concerning the timeframe: This is why we want to start now. Things are not getting better (or easier) when we wait :) In order to focus the discussion again and stop the cross postings: Who would I have to ask to create a seperate KDE-Vision-Mailinglist? Or should we rather do the discussions in one of the existing MLs? ______________________________________________________________________________ [email protected] | https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-artists