Re: [kde-artists] We need a Vision!

Björn Balazs <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:40:26 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.artists,gmane.comp.kde.promotion
Message-ID <2639135.Q5nrSs0bVf@rechenknecht>
Am Donnerstag, 13. März 2014, 11:42:20 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
> On Thursday, March 13, 2014 10:55:09 Björn Balazs wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 11. März 2014, 23:57:57 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
> > > On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 14:55:13 Björn Balazs wrote:
> > impossible to reach them. We do have contact to all users - because we are
> > delivering software to them.
> 
> Not really; we write software, but we rarely do the actual delivery.
> 
> Others take that software, package it and deliver it to their end users with
> no interface to us. When I was traveling between events around the world
> promoting KDE (at one point, twice a month on average) I routinely ran into
> groups doing exactly this whom we had (and in many cases, continue to have)
> little to no contact with.
> 
> So people are using things we make, but there are middlemen between the end
> users and us with a disconnect between us and those middlemen. These same
> middlemen often change how the software is presented to suit their own ideas
> and the needs of their audience.
> 
> Is it possible to build a communication channel between our global user base
> and KDE? Perhaps, though I am skeptical given the nature of how software
> KDE writes gets into the hands of people. Assuming it is possible, it will
> take years to accomplish as it would mean working both with the various
> middlemen involved and likely putting new features into our software that
> will take years to reach our full audience. (Not everyone upgrades every
> release, or even annually ..)
> 
> Assuming we want a vision statement this year, I think one needs to be
> realistic about that.

Agreed. This obviously is a rather long term goal - but worth working on it - 
even though this should be done in a different discussion. We have to work 
with what we have at the moment - always beeing aware of the limitations.

> > experiences. So we could e.g. ask what they associate with KDE or how KDE
> > needs to turn in order to have their mother / girlfirend / ... use it.
> > Then
> 
> The former question is valid, the latter question will get you noise. When
> asked a question, people will give an answer, regardless of whether they are
> in a position to do so with any factual basis or useful insight. This is
> the nature of surveying people (my wife does it for a living, as do many of
> our mutual friends .. it's an interesting, and difficult, thing to get
> useful information out of people by asking questions.)
> 
> What we could do is learn about the people who do use KDE and about those
> who we would like to use KDE. We'd still need to formulate a "how to get X
> to use KDE software.." based on that, however.
> 
> The surveying alone is a task that is likely to take the better part of a
> year to get useful results.

Again agreed. The questions were rather quick examples than actual candidates 
for the survey. And concerning the timeframe: This is why we want to start 
now. Things are not getting better (or easier) when we wait :)

In order to focus the discussion again and stop the cross postings: Who would 
I have to ask to create a seperate KDE-Vision-Mailinglist? Or should we rather 
do the discussions in one of the existing MLs?
______________________________________________________________________________
[email protected] |  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-artists