Re: [Fwd: Re: [Dlc-discuss] [Fwd: Linux fragmentation and desktop standards]]

James Richard Tyrer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.cafe
Message-ID <[email protected]>
dep wrote:
> begin  James Richard Tyrer's  quote:
> | Perhaps some of you would like to join this list as well as the
> | XFree86 forum.
> |
> | If HP only knew how many of the problems I try to solve are caused
> | by stuff being in the wrong directory.
> 
> alas, it's hopeless. and redhat is big enough that if there were only 
> one standard, it would be there's; so the result is that there is the 
> wrong, redhat, standard, the whatever-debian-does standard, the 
> yes-slackware-is-still-around standard, the 
> everybody-else-except-gentoo standard, and the 
> gentoo-we-do-it-because-our-users-are-gentoo-zombies standard. it 
> won't get fixed because distributors, for various reasons, don't want 
> it to be. users and developers don't count. never will. not anymore.

You make very valid points.  However, the problem is real.  For some reason, H-P advocates the 
throw-everything-in-the-same-directory system.  Even Windows doesn't do that anymore.

My major complaint can be stated in a simple example: Where to you put a Mozilla plugin:

	/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/

	/usr/mozilla/plugins/

	/usr/local/mozilla/plugins/

Nobody has explained to me why the first one is better or more logical.

--
JRT


Kde-cafe mailing list - [email protected]
http://ofb.biz/lists/listinfo.cgi/kde-cafe

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this mailinglist are the personal
opinions of the author and do not represent KDE or the author's employer.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.