Re: OfB.biz: It's Official: SCO Declares IP Jihad on Linux
Pupeno <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.cafe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 05 May 2003 02:59, Tim Jansen wrote: > On Saturday 03 May 2003 02:17, Tim Jansen wrote: > > Maybe an interesting question (at least for me) is: what happens when two > > people write the same code without copying? Does the owner of the first > > implementation have to prove that the works are not only the same, but > > the later version has actually been copied? > > To answer my own question: according to this article SCO must prove that > the code has been copied. > http://www.zdnet.com.au/newstech/os/story/0,2000048630,20274208,00.htm That is, if the porpouse is to make linux kernel not use that code, if the porpouse is some publicity, that's already done ;) - -- Pupeno: [email protected] http://www.pupeno.com - --- Help the hungry children of Argentina, please go to (and make it your homepage): http://www.porloschicos.com/servlet/PorLosChicos?comando=donar -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+trZ+Lr8z5XzmSDQRAiXHAJsEX8Z0nw49W/1zxHrtTSQi8BoGjgCeOd6W oBiHIUccSUq7nDHaK43cqnM= =HG60 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Kde-cafe mailing list - [email protected] http://ofb.biz/lists/listinfo.cgi/kde-cafe DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this mailinglist are the personal opinions of the author and do not represent OfB.biz: Open for Business, KDE or the author's employer.