Re: Cheney's Halliburton to Control Iraqi Oil?

Daniel Cassidy <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.cafe
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sunday 11 May 2003 1:16 pm, dep wrote:
> begin  Daniel Cassidy's  quote:
> | I have. The saying has always been 'nine tenths' around here,
> | although I've no idea where or how it originated. It's pretty much
> | irrelevant anyway; with "nine tenths" it's pretty close to fact,
> | with "nine parts" it fails to say anything at all.
>
> http://www.tdctrade.com/econforum/hkma/hkma021001.htm
>
> it's not that it said nothing at all so much as it does not say what
> you would like it to say.

Without prior knowledge of how many parts the law has, it says nothing.

> the phrase, as to the parts of the law, has been around since at least
> the 18th century, when colley cibber had it as "eleven points of the
> law."

Well, I consider the difference between nine tenths and nine elevenths to be 
fairly nominal, especially since nobody has the time to sit down and actually 
work out how much of an influence posession has on the law. Empirical 
evidence suggests, to me, that either saying is fairly close to the truth.

-- 
dan

"Were i susceptible to having my mind changed, it would have changed my mind" 
- Matthew Parris

Kde-cafe mailing list - [email protected]
http://ofb.biz/lists/listinfo.cgi/kde-cafe

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this mailinglist are the personal
opinions of the author and do not represent OfB.biz: Open for Business, KDE or the author's employer.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.