Re: a little something worth noting . . .

"Timothy R. Butler" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.cafe
Organization Universal Networks
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> > Did you do the same to Clinton or is this a double standard since you
> > don't like Bush?
>
> I don't have loyalty to people or parties.  My loyalty is to the country,
> and the country would be a lot better off IMO if everyone was.  "Both"
> parties could disappear next week and the country would go on.

  So you attacked Clinton's past in a similar manor to how you are now 
attacking Bush's past?


> I don't buy it, and I think if you don't either.  It has everything to do
> with mindset - when someone is of the "other" party you are in attack mode,
> if of the "same" party you are in defense mode.  In both cases it is
> unpatriotic IMO - your concern should be with the country and truth and
> what is right and just, not attacking or defending a party or a person. 

  As I said, I don't generally attack either side's personal past. I only 
brought it up, in part, to show the inappropriateness of doing so. 

> And if you are honest with yourself then the allegations against Bush (a
> cokehead and deserter) are worse than those against Clinton (a pothead and
> avoider).

  Hmm... I'm not sure if I would say that. Then again, I'm dubious on Bush and 
Clinton either deserving the titles you give them concerning drug usage... I 
suspect they overemphasize the issue. Whether draft-dodging or somehow 
slipping out of duty without penalty is worse, I'm not really sure. Neither 
is particularly a choice thing, and IIRC, both are felonies.

> I don't see it in anything near the same degree, and what I do see is
> mainly directed at the hypocrisy of the Republicans.  OTOH I saw a lot of
> Democrats sickened about Clinton's drug and Vietnam behavior, whereas the
> Republicans never can seem to criticize "their" party.

  Well, what about all of the attacks on Bush for having the photo-perfect 
time on the aircraft carrier. Of course he wanted to look good - just like 
every president. It's normal, but many democrats are mumbling about it 
anyway.

  -Tim

- -- 
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
Timothy R. Butler       Universal Networks      www.uninet.info
==================== <[email protected]> ====================
| Christian Portal:      | Have you not learned great lessons |
|      www.faithtree.com | from those  who  braced themselves |
| GNU/Linux News:        | against  you   and   disputed  the |
|            www.ofb.biz | passage with you?   --Walt Whitman |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+wazXK37Cns9gJ0gRAugoAJ9wHdn+2+jShswEk+fRAz+xnoMsngCfQfqd
SePNQW8KNo8Sx73gqFxpQxs=
=dPy9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Kde-cafe mailing list - [email protected]
http://ofb.biz/lists/listinfo.cgi/kde-cafe

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this mailinglist are the personal
opinions of the author and do not represent OfB.biz: Open for Business, KDE or the author's employer.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.