Re: The Fourteen Characteristics of Fascism
Rob Kaper <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.cafe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 04:55:25AM -0500, Andreas Pour wrote: > Food for thought: http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/britt_23_2.htm Okay, let's think. 1. Powerful an continuing expressions of nationalism This would be hard to prove in the case of the US, as the flag, for example, has always been a popular item. I know at least 5 food stores with US flags as their hallmark and I'm not even in a US city. I believe the American Chicken place even has halal food, by the way. Off-topic, but I thought that was funny. Anyway, it's not like we have the big whooping military parades. Sure, we honor our troops and veterans, but when was the last time you saw 50,000 soldiers march on 5th Avenue? 2. Disdain for the importance of human rights With all those human rights activists walking around? I don't seriously think this is true in the US. 3. Identification of enemies/scapegoats as a unifying cause For months I've heard the whole population united *against* the war. So this one doesn't apply either. 4. The supremacy of the military/avid militarism The US military is supreme because it was boosted in the Cold War to keep equilibrium. Even since the Soviet Union collapsed and especially since the Gulf War the army has been getting smaller, cheaper, leaner. Not my idea, Rumsfeld's. If only the mean-and-lean tactics would've worked for NASA as well. 5. Rampant sexism Women as second-class citizens? Sure, for some people that will be true, but again, I have no indication that this is "rampant" in the US. 6. A controlled mass media Hello? Internet? Internet is mass media too. Sure, it can be personalized, the actual requests are individual, but it's Gutenberg all over. You've been venting against the government and TLC for too long for me to believe the Internet is controlled. Or take Michael Moore. Miramax is even sponsering Fahrenheit 911 and I don't think any media outlet has not reported on his Academy Award speech. I've seen the tanks, the demonstrations, the bodies and the statues being taken down. Our mass media is not controlled. 7. Obsession with national security Hillary Clinton openly attacked the HDS plans and actions. Yet she has not been "portrayed as unpatriotic or even treasonous". In fact, she might even run for President in 2008, even though she already served two terms. 8. Religion and ruling elite tied together True, there is a fair amount of Christianity in the government. I'm not always pleased with that myself. 9. Power of corporations protected Yet the airline industry doesn't get what it wants. The MPAA/RIAA are losing almost every legal battle. Corporations have no power, other than those providing basic necessities (utilities, housing). That's why I am all for stricter regulations on those markets. But when it comes to soda and popcorn: let corporations do as they please. It's an illusion to say corporations have any power. I spend my money as I please. (don't you?) 10. Power of labor suppressed or eliminated I don't see how organized labor is suppressed in the US. 11. Disdain and suppression of intellectuals and the arts Partially a problem, which is why I am a EFF member. 12. Obsession with crime and punishment The police has no unchecked power, not even almost. 13. Rampant cronyism and corruption Always present, anywhere. That's not a sign of facsism, but of life. 14. Fraudulent elections I don't buy that argument actually. Hitler rose to power in a completely legitimate way. Nothing fraudulent, just a loophole in Weimar law. As for the 2000 Florida elections: that's further away now than how far the new presidential elections are ahead. Noone changed the way representatives are voted for, so if enough people want so, Bush will be gone in less than two years. Of course, as you believe Clinton was also a muppet, erm puppet, that won't necessarily do any good. Kerry, Edwards, Lieberman, Gerhardt, Dean.. do *any* of these meet your approval? Or how about the Libertarian Party? Okay, I've thought about it for a bit. And I'm relieved. The US barely has any signs of fascism. Nor has my own country, except for points 1 (Queen's birthday is a national holiday, widely celebrated, mandatory day off), a bit of 12 at the moment (will wear off), 13 (again, it's anywhere) and a bit of 14 (we had elections in January but still no new parliament.. no wonder politicians get killed here). Oh, and our crown prince married the daughter of a member of the Argentinian dicator regime, Zorreguieta. Of course our queen and her mom married Nazi's, so we're improving. Damn, I could post so much crap about our royal house.. I can see where you get your energy from. Any chance Beatrix is in the evil TLC as well? She has $5.2 billion (not bad for simply being born out of the right cunt), only second to Liliane Bettencourt (L'Oreal dynasty), so that should make her a candidate, no? Rob -- Rob Kaper | "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little [email protected] | temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." www.capsi.com | - Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+wkcZtppIl2G1SjcRAsmRAKDASvAYirY13zXqKgl/s9r6p0LwbQCgxCVl g3Em3o4iCmPK6GYTkGodT4s= =c4gF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----