Re: OK, I admit.
Simon Hausmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.cafe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 07:55:58PM +0100, Daniel Cassidy wrote:
> On Sunday 8 June 2003 7:18 pm, Maks Orlovich wrote:
> > > If you're referring to the fact that GCC 3.2 refuses to compile just
> > > about everything, I certainly see your point. I'm more than slightly
> > > pissed off at the GCC developers making what seem to be completely
> > > arbitrary decisions about what constitutes valid C and what doesn't.
> >
> > You mean for following the language standards? If you want to be angry, be
> > angry at the std:: hack in 2.95.x
>
> Well, whatever they've done it's caused some quite serious damage to my
> ability to compile anything. A switch to use the old behaviour would be nice.
What is 'anything' , and what errors are you running into?
Simon (a bit surprised, given that vendors like SuSE or RedHat
compile their whole distro with gcc3)
Kde-cafe mailing list - [email protected]
http://ofb.biz/lists/listinfo.cgi/kde-cafe
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this mailinglist are the personal
opinions of the author and do not represent OfB.biz: Open for Business, KDE or the author's employer.