Re: Free speech: Perpetually at risk
Neil Stevens <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.cafe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday June 25, 2003 07:58, Rob Kaper wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:46:20PM -0500, Andreas Pour wrote: > > The Elks argued they were in fact selective b/c, among other things, > > they imposed the requirement that potential members believe in God. > > The court was siply rejecting that argument, on the basis that this > > requirement hardly rules out anyone (and hence does not make the club > > "*genuinely* selective". > > > > The "genuintely" part is presumably meant to prevent clubs from coming > > up with arbitrary restrictions, which are not enforced, and thereby > > arguing they are private rather than public. > > So does that mean now that they can't discriminate against women, they > can't discriminate on religious beliefs (or lack thereof) either? > > (unless they move to Michigan and call for affirmative action, of > course) Right.. there will be no quota in club admission, mind you. There will just be individual examination of each candidate, in order to ensure diversity and create a critical mass of the "diverse" worldview. - -- Neil Stevens - [email protected] "I'll believe it when I see it." -- George Walker Bush -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE++mL9f7mnligQOmERArqZAJ0ZKWD9qyfpdkCc6B5v3OGikRNDzwCggDnk TFmLmwdYtukpqSSosAzjL+M= =e0th -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Kde-cafe mailing list - [email protected] http://ofb.biz/lists/listinfo.cgi/kde-cafe DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this mailinglist are the personal opinions of the author and do not represent OfB.biz: Open for Business, KDE or the author's employer.