Re: [Fwd: Re: checking for GTK and glib in configure.in.in ?]
Rob Kaper <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.cafe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 03:03:21AM -0700, James Richard Tyrer wrote: > Discussion of this belongs here -- not on: "kde-devel". > > I direct your attention to the statement: > > Yes, new people are not welcomed ... . > > Is this really the way it is? That KDE is a clique and new people are > truly not welcome? No. I have no idea who Friedrich Kossebau is, so *at most* he has an equal voice as other KDE contributors and might even be a candidate to be ignored. kde-devel is mostly a list to aid third party devleopers and by no means a decision making platform for KDE. I feel discussion of GTK+ checks for KSVG belong on ksvg-devel primarily and possibly on kde-policies when KSVG is intended to make the KDE base packages. But since you brought it here: I would personally be against the use of GTK+ in any KDE application because a KDE application is what it is by utilizing the Qt toolkit and KDE extensions of it. Yes, it is sometimes easier to take existing code and ignore any GUI and coding inconsistencies, but that's not what KDE is about. GTK+ and glib don't offer much that Qt and KDE don't offer as well, so I see no reason to add several extra dependencies because developers of an SVG implementation have to do less work. Note too that KDE exists of disjointed development groups: for example, I try to encourage developers on kde-games-devel to get involved more. It might be true that parts of KDE are at danger of being closed down to a clique*, but it's not true for KDE at large. * kde-packager, kde-security and apparently khtml-devel are examples of a lack of openness in some areas I don't always necessarily agree with. Fighting the good fight, eh? Rob -- Rob Kaper | "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little [email protected] | temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." www.capsi.com | - Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/M7XWtppIl2G1SjcRAkorAKCw47Oxyv/9JW3vxf46g/aALSy1MwCgjStP QGEd0/tRRUuiL2E8Kw5Iikk= =IoU3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----