Re: Sun de-emphasizes GNOME devel platform, supports KDE apps

Steve Hutton <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.cafe
Message-ID <[email protected]>
In article <[email protected]>, Navindra Umanee wrote:
> Steve Hutton <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Interesting, I guess I can see some sort of small consistancy in
>> their strategy if they are positioning Sun Linux as a development
>> platform.  To see the consistancy you have to accept that the reason
>> Sun chose GNOME over KDE was on the advice of their internal development
>> staff and other C hackers.  I think they tried to "pick the one developers
>> will like best."  
> 
> I don't understand your logic.  If anything it seems to me that they
> don't want to encourage developers to develop for the GNOME platform,
> but rather develop for the Java platform.  It's not "Sun Linux" at
> all...  it's "Java Desktop".

Exactly, and that is consistant with their big picture strategy - not
what we may have percieved as thier Linux strategy when they cozied up
to GNOME.

> After being so gung-ho for GNOME, why do they now not want to
> encourage developers to target it?  I'd almost say that the GNOME
> development platform being C and all is somewhat retrograde compared
> to KDE and Java, and that Sun realises that.

Some in Sun surely recognize this.  But if they think developers want
a GNOME based desktop, they can give them that...and then push Java
development.  They have a vested interest in pushing Java development,
and none in pushing GNOME (or KDE development).
> 
>> Certainly Sun's track record on the desktop is not particularly strong,
>> even in recent years.  They remind us again here by pushing Java client
>> development.
> 
> Java is actually quite nice and clean as a development platform.

Java has a very complete set of libraries, and certainly its APIs
are superior to monstrocities like MFC, but I don't find the language
itself to be particularly exciting (I prefer Python as an interpreted 
alternative to C++; it supports C++ abstraction techniques like operator
overloading).  

Anyway, my last point was really that Java *client* development
has beeen a huge failure, and is still not particulary attractive.

Steve


Kde-cafe mailing list - [email protected]
http://ofb.biz/lists/listinfo.cgi/kde-cafe

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this mailinglist are the personal
opinions of the author and do not represent OfB.biz: Open for Business, KDE or the author's employer.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.