Re: Bush began Iraq plan pre-9/11

Guillaume Laurent <[email protected]> Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:42:35 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.cafe
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Monday 12 January 2004 22:29, dep wrote:
> quoth Guillaume Laurent:
> | I should have said "akin to how WW-II is represented in US History"
> |
> | :-)
>
> you might wanna look here; in addition to everything else, o'neill was
> apparently lying.
>
> http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/005628.php

What "everything else" are you referring to ? As for lying, this url is not 
very convincing. That one document was misrepresented hardly undermines the 
whole case. I don't expect O'Neill to be completely objective and honest 
either, or given the sheer volume of documents that could even be an 
overlook. To then say that "There is only one possible conclusion: Paul 
O'Neill and Ron Suskind are attempting to perpetrate a massive hoax on the 
American people." is a bit far fetched.

That said, the commentary on BBC News this morning was saying that it was 
likely the story would die down without real damage to the Bush admin.

-- 
				Guillaume
				http://www.telegraph-road.org

Kde-cafe mailing list - [email protected]
http://ofb.biz/lists/listinfo.cgi/kde-cafe

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this mailinglist are the personal
opinions of the author and do not represent OfB.biz: Open for Business, KDE or the author's employer.