Re: A possible other side of the new space project

On Monday 19 January 2004 22:48, dep wrote:
>
> issue but a different issue. that without consulting the document i
> conclude that 3.8 percent of the gdp is not unreasonable for defense,
> or that going to space is a good thing, or that breathing air is
> something i prefer to not doing so (which i suspect they also think is
> true), i've at least raised the possibility that it's a conclusion that
> can be arrived at independently.

I'm afraid you make two incorrect assumptions here :

- that you've reached the same conclusions for the same reasons as them
- that you've reached them independently (i.e. free from any influence)

> and in any case i do not subscribe to the notion of secretive tinfoil
> hat organizations

Do I really strike you as a paranoid who would give into conspiration theories 
?

I strongly suggest you take a good look at their website before arguing any 
further. PNAC is a well known think tank, not making any mystery of their 
intentions or its constituents.

-- 
				Guillaume
				http://www.telegraph-road.org

Kde-cafe mailing list - [email protected]
http://ofb.biz/lists/listinfo.cgi/kde-cafe

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this mailinglist are the personal
opinions of the author and do not represent OfB.biz: Open for Business, KDE or the author's employer.