Re: Re: qt-only?
Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]> Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:46:48 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.darwin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday 23 December 2004 09:21, John Davidorff Pell wrote: > Ok, well I've answered some of my own question. The KDElibs patch is > still pretty huge, and I've only looked at about a fifth of it. So far, > I've only found one meaningful addition, the rest has all been > ifdef'ing out X11 specific code. Does anyone know why KDE has not > integrated this? It would make sense: patches that do not break any > existing builds, but enable future extensions should be integrated, no? > > Is anyone on PR duty with the KDE people? If someone wants to give me > some guidelines (last time I tried, I missed some things and ended up > doing nothing useful :-/), I could do the leg-work of e-mailing the > appropriate people to try and improve integration. > > Thanx again, > JP Subscribe to kde-core-devel, there are the important guys :-) Alex -- Work: [email protected] - http://www.jenoptik-los.de Home: [email protected] - http://www.kde.org [email protected] - http://www.neundorf.net