Re: [PATCH] KDE4 Fix to use QtTest from Framework on MacOSX
"Erik L. Bunce" <[email protected]> Sat, 26 Aug 2006 18:14:27 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.buildsystem,gmane.comp.kde.non-linux,gmane.comp.kde.darwin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Benjamin Reed wrote: > On 8/26/06, Erik L. Bunce <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> [email protected] list. If you are interested in the Qt >> patch it can be found at: http://kde.bunce.us/qt-mac-20060824.patch >> > > erm, never mind, you're *removing* app_bundle, not adding. ;) > misread the patch. > _______________________________________________ > > Yup, I was removing it. Didn't have all the details I included in the [email protected] email handy when I sent to this list since I sent that message from work using my work email and don't have it here at home. As I remember (looking at that patch) I said something to the effect: - Make QtTest and QtDBus build frameworks in a fashion consistent with the rest of the Qt frameworks. - Make QUiLoader build both debug and release static libs when the rest of Qt is automagically doing it. - Make the QtDBus command line tools not be app-bundles (since it blocked the KDE build). Anyway, hope the troll's accept it. It'd make the lives of us multi-platform folks simpler. The QtTest and part of the QUiLoader mods also are applicable to Windows builds. I also hope someone with commit access accepts my kdebuild one. I'm actually trying to work on kdelibs on Linux, MacOSX, and Windows. Someday I'll probably go for a KDE SVN account, but not today. Enjoy, Erik L. Bunce Chief Software Engineer of the Apocalypse P.S. To the [email protected] list maintainer. Minor suggestion, it would pobably be a good idea to add this list to the http://www.kde.org/mailinglists/ page and add a description of this list to the https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo page.