Re: [Fwd: Re: [Discuss] xlibs based UI]

On Sunday 01 February 2004 11:31 am, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Sunday 01 February 2004 03:51, Kurt Pfeifle wrote:
> > FYI... (see also last paragraph).
> >
> >
> >
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 18:00:44 -0800
> > From: Bruce Perens <[email protected]>
> > To: [email protected], [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [Discuss] xlibs based UI
>
> ...
>
> > I already have a customer asking for Perens LLC to provide commercial
> > support for KDE on the UserLinux platform. And we will do so, even
> > though KDE is not the chosen GUI of the UserLinux project. This is an
> > option for any UserLinux service provider.
> >
> >     Thanks
> >
> >     Bruce
>
> I just wanted to forward exactly the same message, but now I saw you have
> been faster.
>
> I don't know what to think of it. This is getting ... bizarre.
> Bruce says: "we don't support qt". Then he says "because it is not good for
> commercial developlment." Now he says "we will support kde because a
> commercial vendor asks for it." But he says "we don't support it in UL".
>
> I don't understand this. It doesn't make any sense to me. Can somebody
> please explain this ?

sounds like he has a customer that wants kde.  he is being driven by customer 
demand.

regards,

mark