Re: [Fwd: Re: [Discuss] xlibs based UI]
Kevin Krammer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.debian |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sunday 01 February 2004 17:31, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > I don't know what to think of it. This is getting ... bizarre. > Bruce says: "we don't support qt". Then he says "because it is not good for > commercial developlment." Now he says "we will support kde because a > commercial vendor asks for it." But he says "we don't support it in UL". > > I don't understand this. It doesn't make any sense to me. Can somebody > please explain this ? I think it makes perfect sense. Create a barely useable base distribution, exclude the advanced options using some pseudo reasoning, and have customer pay for inclusion of them. Cheers, Kevin -- Kevin Krammer <[email protected]> Qt/KDE Developer, Debian User www.mrunix.de - Unix/Linux programming forum www.qtforum.org - Qt programming forum _______________________________________________ kde-debian mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-debian
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAHTnJnKMhG6pzZJIRAuZBAJwN0x33AimqgfdhI2+gBUxhej71mACfcidg 8afMx5z5hmAedJv2J5IeJ1E= =s3J6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----