Re: fuse/fuse-kio packaging [was: Re: Packaging effort...]
Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]> Wed, 7 Apr 2004 21:51:02 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.debian |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 18:54, Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote: > On Monday 05 April 2004 20:37, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > You forgot that I also voted for Kevin :-) > > Err, yes... =). Wasn't that your idea originally? It certainly wasn't me > who came with the idea... =). > > [snip] > > > How is your fuse packaging going ? If you have problems, either send me a > > direct mail or ask here :-) > > (I'm not that often on irc....) > > I have working fuse (only had to add one patch, it's mostly ready for > upload; i used existing fuse-1.1 debian/ dir). More problems are with your > fuse-kio... It's not exactly easy to create clean source package, as the > cmake tool generates a lot of cruft in source dir and there's no dist-clean > make target. cmake needs only the CMakeList.txt file, all the rest is generated and can be deleted. Can you please specify what exactly you need to know ? > I'm reluctant to include all the generated files in .orig.gz. > OTOH, this might be good idea. Will look at it. What would help the most > here is a release tarball from you, upon which i could build. Doing this > from CVS is slightly difficult, as i'm not sure what belongs into release > and what does not. To sum up: either dist-clean make target or release > tarball would help tremendeously. Ok, will try to get something together :-) Bye Alex -- Work: [email protected] - http://www.jenoptik-los.de Home: [email protected] - http://www.kde.org [email protected] - http://www.neundorf.net