Re: [Accessibility] Re: D-Bus-based accessibility API
Willie Walker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.accessibility |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1187713203.29655.117.camel@server> |
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 07:04 +0200, Olaf Schmidt wrote: > [ Willie Walker, Di., 14. Aug. 2007 ] > > Given that it sounds like the Trolltech API and the AT-SPI are identical > > for the intents and purposes of such testing, I'd guess one could pick > > several pairs of apps (one from GNOME, same sort of one from KDE) and > > conduct studies such as latency, packet size, CPU usage, memory usage > > and the user and assistive technology interact with the apps. > > The difficulty, of course, is then that we are dealing with different > applications which might have speed differences themselves. So we are not > truly testing the speed of the API. True, but it should hopefully help give us an idea. > > Yep! That's why I proposed/pushed for the creation of the pyatspi > > bindings and why we purposely tried to hide CORBA/ORBit/Bonobo stuff. > > Knowing the current implementation of pyatspi, I suspect it may become a > > bit of work at the pyatspi binding level to handle both the CORBA and > > DBUS solutions. > > Yes, it might indeed be a bit of work, especially if we want to use both of > them at the same time. I think we have a number of users that want to use KDE and GNOME applications side by side. Will