Re: qt-atspi bug tracker and hosting

Oops, forgot, if we don't move to kdesupport/git.kde.org we could use a bug
tracker on sourceforge or something like that.  And also use the sf/other
hosting to do releases from and such.

Jeremy

On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Jeremy Whiting <[email protected]> wrote:

> Frederik, Jose, all,
>
> I spoke with the kde sysadmins and they agree it doesn't make sense to put
> qt-atspi into bugs.kde.org unless it's code is moved from gitorious to
> kdesupport on git.kde.org.  I thus hereby propose we migrate it.  I would
> like feedback though, as I'm not sure if that's enough reason to migrate
> (convenience for those developing)
>
> Arguments for:
> 1 Convenient and good location, since kde accessibility will rely on the
> bridge to work with at tools like orca, etc.
> 2 Mostly KDE developers have worked on it so far, besides Mark Doffman's
> initial work on it at codethink.
>
> Arguments against:
> 1 Makes it slightly harder for non kde developers to contribute to it than
> leaving it on gitorious.
> 2 Other qt-only applications that might want it may not look for it hosted
> under kdesupport.
>
> ideas? thoughts?
> Jeremy
>

_______________________________________________
gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list