Re: qt-atspi bug tracker and hosting

2011/8/15 Jeremy Whiting <[email protected]>:
> Frederik, Jose, all,
>
> I spoke with the kde sysadmins and they agree it doesn't make sense to put
> qt-atspi into bugs.kde.org unless it's code is moved from gitorious to
> kdesupport on git.kde.org.  I thus hereby propose we migrate it.  I would
> like feedback though, as I'm not sure if that's enough reason to migrate
> (convenience for those developing)

Sorry for the delay in the response :(

I think migrating it would be a good idea, but I would prefer to add
it as a subproject of kdeaccessibility than to add it to kdesupport.
The problem is, I think qt-at-spi was intended to be made part of Qt,
Is qt-at-spi intended to be part of Qt by default? If so, would it be
a problem the fact that it is developed in git.kde.org?

> 1 Makes it slightly harder for non kde developers to contribute to it than leaving it on gitorious.

I don't think it will be much harder (there's no possibility of merge
request but there's reviewboard), and also it might make a bit easier
for KDE developers to contribute if it's in git.kde.org