Re: Simon: Organizational Structure

Mario Fux A11Y ML <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.devel.accessibility
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am Montag 05 August 2013, 21.50:05 schrieb Peter Grasch:
> Hi,

Morning Peter and Co

> as the scope of our project grows to include sample acquisition, web
> application development, etc. it certainly makes sense to talk about
> some organizational parameters.
> 
> After a lively discussion in the meeting, and some more thinking this is
> what I would propose:
> "The Open Speech Group" (name is a work in progress)
> The open speech group would be a team name under the KDE e.V.'s
> umbrella. This means that it would be be subject to the principles and
> recipient of all the benefits defined by the KDE manifesto:
> http://manifesto.kde.org (please read it carefully)
> 
> In practice, I'd like to have a dedicated category in KDE's extragear,
> putting "Speech" on the same level as e.g. "PIM" or "Network". Within
> this group (project), we'd then collect all different sub-projects (like
> the LiveTranscriber, models, etc.).
> The KDE manifesto ensures that we each have access to each other's
> projects, guaranteeing open collaboration.
> 
> The barrier of entry for a new, interested contributer is in this case
> defined as "getting a KDE contributer account" (basically signing up for
> an account online and having someone else from the team vouch for you).
> Regarding this, I would also like to remind you that technically, you
> have all cleared that "barrier of entry" already in some form or
> another: Simon is a KDE project and to a certain extend you all are now
> contributers. What I'm trying to highlight here is that in practice, the
> barrier of entry is mostly defined by the community behind the project,
> not the steps themselves. And KDE has an outstanding track record when
> it comes to community spirit.
> 
> Here's some more reasons why I think we're better off under the KDE
> umbrella than outside of it:
> * KDE brings established practices, infrastructure and credibility.
> * The KDE community is very active and inclusive. Just by mere
> association we gain potential contributers.
> * KDE has established marketing and promotion channels.
> * The KDE e.V. is an openly governed, stable legal foundation with more
> than 15 years of experience.
> * Inclusion in community initiatives like Google Summer of Code or
> Season of KDE.
> * Much more but it's getting late and I'm pretty tired :)

Let me add some stuff.

- We get wikis (techbase.kde.org for technical stuff, community.kde.org for 
organisational stuff and userbase.kde.org for enduser documentation).
- We get mailinglists, a great and responsive sysadmin team, a cdn mirror 
network, translators and i18n/l10n people
- Other great community...
- Oh and before I forget: live hacking sprints like randa-meetings.ch and 
similar ;-).

> Let me know what you think.

Of course from my side a big plus one.

> Best regards,
> Peter

Best
Mario
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.