Re: Simon: Organizational Structure
Mario Fux A11Y ML <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.accessibility |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Montag 05 August 2013, 21.50:05 schrieb Peter Grasch: > Hi, Morning Peter and Co > as the scope of our project grows to include sample acquisition, web > application development, etc. it certainly makes sense to talk about > some organizational parameters. > > After a lively discussion in the meeting, and some more thinking this is > what I would propose: > "The Open Speech Group" (name is a work in progress) > The open speech group would be a team name under the KDE e.V.'s > umbrella. This means that it would be be subject to the principles and > recipient of all the benefits defined by the KDE manifesto: > http://manifesto.kde.org (please read it carefully) > > In practice, I'd like to have a dedicated category in KDE's extragear, > putting "Speech" on the same level as e.g. "PIM" or "Network". Within > this group (project), we'd then collect all different sub-projects (like > the LiveTranscriber, models, etc.). > The KDE manifesto ensures that we each have access to each other's > projects, guaranteeing open collaboration. > > The barrier of entry for a new, interested contributer is in this case > defined as "getting a KDE contributer account" (basically signing up for > an account online and having someone else from the team vouch for you). > Regarding this, I would also like to remind you that technically, you > have all cleared that "barrier of entry" already in some form or > another: Simon is a KDE project and to a certain extend you all are now > contributers. What I'm trying to highlight here is that in practice, the > barrier of entry is mostly defined by the community behind the project, > not the steps themselves. And KDE has an outstanding track record when > it comes to community spirit. > > Here's some more reasons why I think we're better off under the KDE > umbrella than outside of it: > * KDE brings established practices, infrastructure and credibility. > * The KDE community is very active and inclusive. Just by mere > association we gain potential contributers. > * KDE has established marketing and promotion channels. > * The KDE e.V. is an openly governed, stable legal foundation with more > than 15 years of experience. > * Inclusion in community initiatives like Google Summer of Code or > Season of KDE. > * Much more but it's getting late and I'm pretty tired :) Let me add some stuff. - We get wikis (techbase.kde.org for technical stuff, community.kde.org for organisational stuff and userbase.kde.org for enduser documentation). - We get mailinglists, a great and responsive sysadmin team, a cdn mirror network, translators and i18n/l10n people - Other great community... - Oh and before I forget: live hacking sprints like randa-meetings.ch and similar ;-). > Let me know what you think. Of course from my side a big plus one. > Best regards, > Peter Best Mario