Re: Simon
Steve Cookson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.accessibility |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Peter, On the subject of long lists, the issue for us is giving each one a command and data, so on calling esofagite descamativa really what I want it to do is call 'alt-d' for diagnosis and d123, say, being the code for the specific diagnosis. Does that work? Regards Steve. On 19/05/14 19:51, Peter Grasch wrote: > On Monday, May 19, 2014 05:21:12 PM you wrote: >> On 18/05/14 20:29, Peter Grasch wrote: >>> Good idea. However, medical terminology is actually very easy to recognize >>> (distinguish) as the words are so long. Coming back to dictation, >>> "pulmonary edema" is actually arguably easier to write than "hey" - and >>> definitely easier than "hay":) >> Many medical terms are very similar too: >> >> esofagite actínica >> esofagite cáustica >> esofagite descamativa >> esofagite eosinofílica >> esofagite erosiva >> esofagite herpética >> esofagite por citomegalovirus >> >> or >> >> colite actínica >> colite de Behçet >> colite isquêmica >> colite microscópica >> colite por desvio de trânsito >> colite pseudomembranosa >> colite ulcerativa >> >> What do you think? > I don't see how those are overly similar. > > An intuitive and very indicative way to look at it is through the edit > distance of the phonetic transcriptions. The higher the edit distance, the > more diverse. For example, "eight", "mate", "kate", "gate", etc. all have an > edit distance of one. > I don't speak Portoguese but it looks like the terms you provided would be > pronounced quite differently... > > Best regards, > Peter >