Re: PyKF5 bindings generator improvements out for review.
Shaheed Haque <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.bindings |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHAc2jdYO6+5kxS-BpAY1kuHyE-e3+RscSWzB48_Ohq9XSNkoQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Luca, Luigi, all, I take responsibility for not being aware of the expectations here (it seems I have been away from KDE for too long!), so apologies for that. I've had a quick look into Phabricator and will look to post the reviews there. Steve, I take it you will be OK with that, so I'll close the PRs. Thanks, Shaheed On 5 February 2017 at 21:25, Luca Beltrame <[email protected]> wrote: > Il giorno Sun, 5 Feb 2017 14:36:26 +0000 > Shaheed Haque <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > Hello Shaheed and Steve, > > > I've reviewed what got merged from PR2 and PR3, and reworked PR4 into > > what I hope is a much more manageable form. The results are in PR9: > > > > https://github.com/ShaheedHaque/extra-cmake-modules/pull/9 > > I hate to be "that guy", but I have to tell you that doing GH pull > requests is not the way to go for a number of reasons: > > - Even if not many touch ECM, it means the few that aren't on GH won't > review your code; > - The ongoing review, for the same reason, is in a place inaccessible > to most people with a KDE contributor account; > - The KDE Manifesto mandates the use of KDE infrastructure for KDE > projects: this means either Reviewboard (going to get retired) or > Phabricator. > > Please don't lock out the larger KDE community just for your own > convenience. > > -- > Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team > GPG key ID: A29D259B >