Re: Python bindings using cppyy (was: An update on Python bindings)
"Philipp A." <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.bindings,gmane.comp.kde.devel.core,gmane.comp.kde.devel.frameworks |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAN8d9gng0Qim=VTm5mQv5oQE40etUoes_tzLG3+x52u9crK9OA@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Shaheed, Thank you for the clarifications! My observation is that *nobody* is likely to help with that problem: the > framework owners did > nothing obvious to either keep PyKDE4 going (out of tree) or to help > Steve with my earlier SIP based efforts (in tree). > It's a bit sad, but not too surprising that the framework maintainers didn't help. I assume it's a matter of priorities for them as well. I do however prefer to maintain compatibility (to Python 2) until the > burden of doing so presents an insurmountable issue. > At this point I'd say you do humanity a bigger favor if you ditch Python 2 even without maintenance burden. Entirely new bindings lead to new applications being written using those bindings. Writing applications in Python 2 is an immediate maintenance burden and people only do it because of stubborn ideology or a complete lack of awareness that Python 2 is being killed off for good. There is no need for a "final decision" from me. I would suggest that > the first question for anybody that cares is to assess the scope of > the issue. Unfortunately, i have other more fundamental issues to fry. > OK, cool! So if this is possible and not over my head, I might be able to try my hands at it. Best regards, Shaheed > The same to you! >