Re: Python bindings using cppyy (was: An update on Python bindings)

"Philipp A." <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.devel.bindings,gmane.comp.kde.devel.core,gmane.comp.kde.devel.frameworks
Message-ID <CAN8d9gng0Qim=VTm5mQv5oQE40etUoes_tzLG3+x52u9crK9OA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Shaheed,

Thank you for the clarifications!

My observation is that *nobody* is likely to help with that problem: the
> framework owners did
> nothing obvious to either keep PyKDE4 going (out of tree) or to help
> Steve with my earlier SIP based efforts (in tree).
>

It's a bit sad, but not too surprising that the framework maintainers
didn't help. I assume it's a matter of priorities for them as well.

I do however prefer to maintain compatibility (to Python 2) until the
> burden of doing so presents an insurmountable issue.
>

At this point I'd say you do humanity a bigger favor if you ditch Python 2
even without maintenance burden.

Entirely new bindings lead to new applications being written using those
bindings. Writing applications in Python 2 is an immediate maintenance
burden and people only do it because of stubborn ideology or a complete
lack of awareness that Python 2 is being killed off for good.

There is no need for a "final decision" from me. I would suggest that
> the first question for anybody that cares is to assess the scope of
> the issue. Unfortunately, i have other more fundamental issues to fry.
>

OK, cool! So if this is possible and not over my head, I might be able to
try my hands at it.

Best regards, Shaheed
>

The same to you!

>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.