[partitionmanager] [Bug 524092] GUI: user-facing consistency and correctness of file system naming (FAT16, not fat16; EXT4, not ext4; etc...)

Andrius Štikonas <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.devel.bugs
Message-ID <[email protected]/>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524092

--- Comment #1 from Andrius Štikonas <[email protected]> ---
Well, maybe our capitalisation is not everywhere right but even official
documentation is inconsistent

https://btrfs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/dev/dev-btrfs-design.html page uses
Btrfs (as does wikipedia), yet in the same documentation BTRFS is used in this
page https://btrfs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Introduction.html I think most
places actually use Btrfs but BTRFS is not that uncommon either.

But yes, in many cases we could switch to better capitalisation.

FAT and NTFS I fully agree with.

I don't think EXT4 is correct capitalisation though. It's either ext4 mid
sentence or Ext4 at the beginning https://docs.kernel.org/admin-guide/ext4.html

FUSE/FUSEBLK I guess is correct but irrelevant to kpmcore/partitionmanager,
it's not used.

LVM2 PV, ISO 9660 - I agree here.

Linux Swap. Hmm, not sure I fully agree with this one. It should probably be
Linux swap. There is no reason to capitalise swap.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.