[partitionmanager] [Bug 524092] GUI: user-facing consistency and correctness of file system naming (FAT16, not fat16; EXT4, not ext4; etc...)
Andrius Štikonas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]/> |
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524092 --- Comment #1 from Andrius Štikonas <[email protected]> --- Well, maybe our capitalisation is not everywhere right but even official documentation is inconsistent https://btrfs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/dev/dev-btrfs-design.html page uses Btrfs (as does wikipedia), yet in the same documentation BTRFS is used in this page https://btrfs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Introduction.html I think most places actually use Btrfs but BTRFS is not that uncommon either. But yes, in many cases we could switch to better capitalisation. FAT and NTFS I fully agree with. I don't think EXT4 is correct capitalisation though. It's either ext4 mid sentence or Ext4 at the beginning https://docs.kernel.org/admin-guide/ext4.html FUSE/FUSEBLK I guess is correct but irrelevant to kpmcore/partitionmanager, it's not used. LVM2 PV, ISO 9660 - I agree here. Linux Swap. Hmm, not sure I fully agree with this one. It should probably be Linux swap. There is no reason to capitalise swap. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.