Re: drkonqi's many debuggers

Harald Sitter <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.devel.core
Message-ID <CAEc+18HLR7mKsxeB6-XXifYdHPYKqtc08eHDx74bT_5crxdVAQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 5:23 AM Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Monday, 28 August 2023 12:59:01 PDT Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> > (puts on FreeBSD hat) On the non-GNU side of the world, lldb is the thing
> > that is "installed anyway" and gdb takes extra effort. Though I don't know
> > if the lldb integration works -- I have both installed, and I don't know if
> > I ever bother to interact with DrKonqi (sorry).
>
> True, but the majority of our user base is still Linux, so if we had to choose
> only one, it would have to be gdb.

I am not quite following. We can depend on any debugger we want,
surely? I mean, there are practical implications to consider for sure,
but gdb being the dominant debugger on Linux doesn't prevent us from
depending on lldb instead.

HS
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.