Re: KDE Review: Hash-o-Matic

Carl Schwan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.devel.core
Message-ID <4932990.31r3eYUQgx@fedora>
On Tuesday, 3 October 2023 03:31:26 CEST Justin Zobel wrote:
> I think it's clear we need some sort of process documentation for KDE
> Review, who is expected to do what, and in which order.
> 
> I've  cc'd Thiago on this as they are KDE's documentation writer, let's
> see if we can get something together.

Before documenting a process, we first need to decide on the process itself, 
which seems to be the point of confussion here. We actually already have 
documentation on the process, but it doesn't make it clear who is responsible 
to fill the checklist:
https://community.kde.org/Policies/Application_Lifecycle#kdereview
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.