Re: CI log verbosity
Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.core |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5727980.DvuYhMxLoT@daneel> |
On Freitag, 3. November 2023 13:01:26 CET Harald Sitter wrote: > What are your thoughts on having the CI be less verbose by default and > instead have an env var or some other toggle to switch into verbose > mode? +1 Ideally, the verbose logs would be written to an artifact. Otherwise, it will be painful to debug intermittent problems. I think the Craft jobs now do this (also in response to insanely verbose output of some builds which made it impossible to see the actual error). > Specifically I'm talking about the qtlogging rules that are currently > enabling everything and the kitchen sink. To my mind we should just > use the default rules by default. > I find that 99% of the time the output is entirely useless in finding > what is wrong, if anything it gets in the way because I first have to > find where the test failure is and then instead of reading walls of qt > plugin info I will just proceed to reproduce the problem locally > anyway. Full ACK. I'm almost always only interested in finding the error which caused the CI job to fail and sometimes in seeing compiler warnings. Regards, Ingo
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQTbjgIOMowwlCBgvyGxb1mVFkdKugUCZUT6AQAKCRCxb1mVFkdK uvuuAQCv8DnzP5C2TyNXIie4SvLTQPbjDhHYQVaa9CcxkM8hAQD/RJogodp7AdV9 dt/QaOQSzvhELMSF4hWLsUp0IKGwbgQ= =/QC6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----