Re: CI log verbosity

Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.devel.core
Message-ID <5727980.DvuYhMxLoT@daneel>
On Freitag, 3. November 2023 13:01:26 CET Harald Sitter wrote:
> What are your thoughts on having the CI be less verbose by default and
> instead have an env var or some other toggle to switch into verbose
> mode?

+1

Ideally, the verbose logs would be written to an artifact. Otherwise, it will 
be painful to debug intermittent problems. I think the Craft jobs now do this 
(also in response to insanely verbose output of some builds which made it 
impossible to see the actual error).

> Specifically I'm talking about the qtlogging rules that are currently
> enabling everything and the kitchen sink. To my mind we should just
> use the default rules by default.
> I find that 99% of the time the output is entirely useless in finding
> what is wrong, if anything it gets in the way because I first have to
> find where the test failure is and then instead of reading walls of qt
> plugin info I will just proceed to reproduce the problem locally
> anyway.

Full ACK. I'm almost always only interested in finding the error which caused 
the CI job to fail and sometimes in seeing compiler warnings.

Regards,
Ingo
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYKAB0WIQTbjgIOMowwlCBgvyGxb1mVFkdKugUCZUT6AQAKCRCxb1mVFkdK
uvuuAQCv8DnzP5C2TyNXIie4SvLTQPbjDhHYQVaa9CcxkM8hAQD/RJogodp7AdV9
dt/QaOQSzvhELMSF4hWLsUp0IKGwbgQ=
=/QC6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.