Re: Kandalf: request for review

Nicolas Fella <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.devel.core
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 12/8/23 00:49, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El divendres, 8 de desembre de 2023, a les 0:44:11 (CET), Carl Schwan va
> escriure:
>> On Fri, Dec 8, 2023, at 12:10 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>>> El dijous, 7 de desembre de 2023, a les 16:28:48 (CET), Loren Burkholder
>>> va
>>>
>>> escriure:
>>>> Hi all!
>>>>
>>>> I've been working towards getting Kandalf ready for integration into KDE
>>>> (and I'd like to thank everyone who has pitched in to help me, mainly
>>>> Laurent and redstrate). At this point, while the app is not necessarily
>>>> feature-complete or fully polished, it's getting close to that point.
>>>> Therefore, I'd like to officially request a review of Kandalf for
>>>> inclusion
>>>> in the KDE apps.
>>> Where is the thing we're supposed to review?
>> In the wrong place:https://invent.kde.org/lorendb/kandalf/-/issues/1
> And again we have people self-checking the checkboxes or their own review
> :sad_dance:
To be fair, nowhere in
https://community.kde.org/Policies/Application_Lifecycle#kdereview does
it say who is supposed to check what box, so people checking "obvious"
boxes like "It has a passing CI build" themselves isn't that far off.
>> I asked Loren to create a sysadmin ticket to get it moved to an offical
>> namespace.
>>
>> That seems premature? What if the review never succeeds?
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.