Re: Kandalf: request for review
Nicolas Fella <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.core |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12/8/23 00:49, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El divendres, 8 de desembre de 2023, a les 0:44:11 (CET), Carl Schwan va > escriure: >> On Fri, Dec 8, 2023, at 12:10 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >>> El dijous, 7 de desembre de 2023, a les 16:28:48 (CET), Loren Burkholder >>> va >>> >>> escriure: >>>> Hi all! >>>> >>>> I've been working towards getting Kandalf ready for integration into KDE >>>> (and I'd like to thank everyone who has pitched in to help me, mainly >>>> Laurent and redstrate). At this point, while the app is not necessarily >>>> feature-complete or fully polished, it's getting close to that point. >>>> Therefore, I'd like to officially request a review of Kandalf for >>>> inclusion >>>> in the KDE apps. >>> Where is the thing we're supposed to review? >> In the wrong place:https://invent.kde.org/lorendb/kandalf/-/issues/1 > And again we have people self-checking the checkboxes or their own review > :sad_dance: To be fair, nowhere in https://community.kde.org/Policies/Application_Lifecycle#kdereview does it say who is supposed to check what box, so people checking "obvious" boxes like "It has a passing CI build" themselves isn't that far off. >> I asked Loren to create a sysadmin ticket to get it moved to an offical >> namespace. >> >> That seems premature? What if the review never succeeds?