Re: Kandalf: request for review
Loren Burkholder <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.core |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <SA3PR20MB5936A48E010317E55ABC5502C797A@SA3PR20MB5936.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> |
On Friday, December 15, 2023 10:16:41 PM EST Loren Burkholder wrote: > I'm back again with more name ideas. > > 1. Alpaka. (h/t to Kevin Kofler for the suggestion) I've tended to veer away from names such as this, because there is a derivative of the Llama 2 model called "Alpaca". However, Alpaca is an open project built by some Stanford researchers, so I doubt that they would mind a similar name from us. > 2. Orakle. This is pretty neat because it invokes the idea of an "oracle" that distributes wisdom; even if an LLM doesn't give out oracle-quality information, it's a fun image to have. The main problem with this name is Big Red; while Oracle is spelled differently, they do have AI products, so this could be a bad idea. > > As a runner-up, I have "Newton". While Newton AI is already a company, I did like this because of William Wordsworth's quote about Isaac Newton: "A mind forever Voyaging through strange seas of Thought, alone.” This somehow seems to embody the technology of LLMs to me. > > Please comment if you have any thoughts; if I don't get feedback on this, Alpaka will probably win by default. > > Thank you and have a great weekend! > > Loren > Hi everyone, At this point I'll plan to move ahead with "Alpaka" since no concerns were shared. Thanks, Loren
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQTSQYn5ZzXqK1gJNwurYssxLOwrvAUCZYG1CwAKCRCrYssxLOwr vNDLAP9LF5Xw7a03q5ZONIchEJJ59cVA0uYctManWh4t/sCqWwEA64infxA05RvK zOvUvtdtcgF/RnH67DyKEMowGgB4Sgc= =mmcT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----