Re: KDE Review Request: Keep Secret
Ben Cooksley <[email protected]> Wed, 20 Aug 2025 20:24:15 +1200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.core |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+XidOE54wWBpuhjnFGrpSkiveT98R91=Gw23yO4eFzR1mmJiA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 11:01 PM Vlad Zahorodnii <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8/19/25 1:42 PM, Marco Martin wrote: > > Hi, > > Several weeks are passed and most of the checklist points are complete > > (neon, snap and windows packages are missing from the checklist, i > > think i'll need help with those?) > > FWIW with knighttime, I filed a bugzilla bug report about it and also > poked neon folks on Matrix. > > As many people pointed out in the past, maybe we could change that > requirement in favor of KDE Linux. > Seems a bit strange to play favourites in favour of one distribution over another - I can understand Flatpak / Snap, but surely specific distros should not be favoured? > > Regards, > Vlad > Thanks, Ben > > > > > Any other blockers to move it in Applications? > > > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 3:22 PM Marco Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I have been working over the last months on an application called Keep > Secret. > >> It is intended to be a password manager gui which uses the Secret > >> Service DBus api > >> as backend, therefore it works with KWallet, gnome-keyring, oo7 etc.. > >> > >> The current home is: > >> > >> https://invent.kde.org/mart/keepsecret > >> > >> It can be tested by having any secret service set up (or just secret > >> service enabled in the KWallet config. > >> > >> I've added a kdereview issue here: > >> https://invent.kde.org/mart/keepsecret/-/issues/1 > >> > >> The final place for this should be i think in gear, under kdeutils? > >> > >> did i miss something? > >> > >> -- > >> Marco Martin >