Re: Stable branches, including frameworks for Kubuntu LTS

--nextParte3oj9iOTTDKZINJfh1MI3w
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; protected-headers="v1"
From: Ingo =?UTF-8?B?S2zDtmNrZXI=?= <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Stable branches, including frameworks for Kubuntu LTS
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 09:31:53 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To:  <CAEg-Je9ZiBeu=_RKZ=WZ_tr3Ty5cqrNi3KJTr+25vVRkAh3QoQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0

On Mittwoch, 13. Mai 2026 05:45:04 Mitteleurop=C3=A4ische Sommerzeit Neal G=
ompa=20
wrote:
> Otherwise, I would rather *not* see these branches at all, not as
> vendor branches either. It's just a bad idea all around because it
> creates confusion for everyone. Even the gpg4win ones create problems.

What problems do the gpg4win branches create?

Regards,
Ingo
--nextParte3oj9iOTTDKZINJfh1MI3w
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iJEEABYKADkWIQTbjgIOMowwlCBgvyGxb1mVFkdKugUCagQo6RsUgAAAAAAEAA5t
YW51MiwyLjUrMS4xMiwyLDIACgkQsW9ZlRZHSrqKYgD/b599IN6DvmG9XFxOn1XW
xyCtGVusFZDeA8bzYJ2G4igBAM/k6aYcPHPr0B1cB+X9tWcm+4rneaVgvBFDSMqz
VN8O
=sa59
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextParte3oj9iOTTDKZINJfh1MI3w--